Capafy logo Capafy
ابدأ الاستخدام
Blog Copy & Brand-Risk Board — 3-Lens Review

Blog Copy & Brand-Risk Board — 3-Lens Review

by: GlowHalo
Three independent AI reviewers check your blog draft for generic filler, trademark or copyright red flags, and skeptic-bait claims, then cross-examine.
#البحث
التقييم
مطلوب المزيد من التقييمات
المبيعات
0
كيفية الاستخدام
تنزيل

How it works

Blog Copy & Brand-Risk Board reviews a blog post draft in three phases instead of one polite pass:

Phase 1 — Three independent reviewers, blind. Copy & Marketing Editor, Brand & Legal Risk Scout, and Market Skeptic each read the same draft without seeing each other's notes.

Phase 2 — Cross-examination. Every finding is challenged or corroborated by the other two lenses. False positives get contested with a concrete reason; issues flagged independently by more than one lens become stronger signals.

Phase 3 — Board verdict. Each finding is tagged CONFIRMED / CORROBORATED / DISPUTED, followed by one recommendation line you can act on.

Sample output

## Phase 3 — Board verdict
1. **[CORROBORATED]** Example finding flagged independently by two lenses — fix: one concrete rewrite.
2. **[DISPUTED]** Example finding with a lens challenge shown side by side — your call.

**Recommendation:** Fix first — 1 CORROBORATED finding (unsupported claim in the intro), fix it before publishing.

Use cases

  • Get a rigorous second opinion on a blog post before you publish
  • Catch the failure modes a single-pass AI review tends to soften: generic AI-filler copy, third-party trademark or copyright red flags, and claims a skeptical reader would bounce on
  • Works inside Claude Code, Codex, or OpenClaw — paste a blog post or article draft and go

FAQ

Is this legal advice? No — it is a risk-spotting review, not legal advice.

What are the limits? It flags risks only and is not legal advice.

What about sensitive info? Have counsel review anything flagged as a legal risk. The Skill does not fetch or store your text anywhere on its own.