Hands-on prompt engineering and LLM evaluation. Built around a diagnose-then-ship loop: forensic transcript critique ▎ that names the exact failure mode, paired with a fixer that produces complete, deployment-ready rewrites — not ▎ vague advice.
Built by a content strategist who knows every platform has its own grammar. LinkedIn rewards authority and conversation; X rewards brevity and hooks; Instagram rewards personality; short-form video rewards pace. This skill extracts the strongest idea from any long-form content and rebuilds it natively for each channel — not copy-paste, actual reformatting that performs.
Paste a git diff, get a review-ready pull request: a structured PR description (summary, what/why, test notes), risk callouts (migrations, API/contract changes, config, deletions), a reviewer attention map that surfaces the riskiest hunks first, and a self-review checklist tailored to the diff. For developers opening PRs with Claude Code, Codex, or any coding agent. Uses only the pasted diff; unknowns are [FILL IN]. No API key, no repo access, no personal data.
Rewrite pasted research-methods prose into natural, disciplined academic language while preserving the design, measures, numbers, and uncertainty that make the work defensible.
An AI agent built for male-lead short dramas across War God, Son-in-Law, CEO, Xianxia, and Rebirth tropes to craft fast-paced, high-gratification episode outlines, 3-second hooks, and review checklists.
An AI agent crafted for female-lead short dramas, mastering archetype recognition, emotion-driven counterattacks, front-loaded climaxes, and high-retention episode outlines.
Helps users turn rough prompts into clear, specific, reusable prompts in different LLMs through concise critique.
I've spent years building production software, designing enterprise architectures, reviewing thousands of code changes, and optimizing AI-assisted development workflows. This Skill packages proven engineering, planning, documentation, testing, and code-review practices into a lightweight workflow that helps AI understand any project before making changes, reducing mistakes, hallucinations, unnecessary token usage, and repeated context loading.
Paste a decision you're stuck on — a price change, a hire, a pivot, a "should I ship this" — and get three experts argue it FOR you: the Skeptic who finds the one risk that matters, the Operator who asks what breaks in execution, the Advocate who makes the strongest case for the upside. A synthesis then names the single question that resolves it. Reasons from your input + domain knowledge only — no invented numbers, no browsing. For founders and PMs tired of arguing with themselves alone.