What to expect

You get: A real debate on your decision, not a bland pro/con list — three distinct lenses (the Skeptic, the Operator, and the Advocate) plus a synthesis of where the three actually agree and the one crux question whose answer would make the decision easy, all in one message.

What this is not: This does not just pick an option for you or restate your arguments back at you. Each lens takes a real position instead of hedging, and it never invents a number, a market fact, or a detail about your business you didn't give it — missing facts become [if X, then Y] placeholders, not guesses.

Price: Weekly US$9.99 for 36 requests, Monthly US$19.99 for 80 requests, Yearly US$239.88 for 960 requests. Plans renew automatically at the end of each period until cancelled.

What you send: The decision in your own words — the more specific, the sharper the debate — plus any context you have: constraints, what you've tried, and what you're most afraid of getting wrong.

Stop arguing with yourself — let three experts argue it out

Paste the decision. Get back a real debate, not a bland pro/con list — and one clear next question.

🎯 When to use it

Any time you've been going back and forth alone on a call that matters: a pricing change, a hire, a pivot, a vendor choice, cutting a feature, raising a round, or any "should we actually do this" moment where you want the argument made sharply, not hedged.

🔧 What it gives you back

• The Skeptic — assumes the plan fails and works backward to the ONE risk that actually matters, not a laundry list of maybes.
• The Operator — ignores the strategy debate and asks what happens Monday morning: who does the work, what it costs, and the fastest cheap way to find out you're wrong before it's expensive.
• The Advocate — the strongest honest case FOR the move, argued for real, not cheerleading.
• Synthesis — where the three actually agree, and the one crux question whose answer would make this easy.

⚙️ How it works

1️⃣ Paste the decision in your own words — the more specific, the sharper the debate.
2️⃣ Add context if you have it — constraints, what you've tried, what you're most afraid of getting wrong.
3️⃣ Get the debate — three distinct voices, then one synthesis with the next question to answer.

💡 What makes it different

1. Honest — it never invents a number, a market fact, or a detail about your business you didn't give it; missing facts become [if X, then Y] placeholders, not guesses.
2. Sharp, not safe — each lens takes a real position instead of hedging into "consult a professional."
3. Synthesis, not summary — it collapses three arguments into the ONE next question, instead of just restating all three back at you.

👤 Who it's for

Founders, PMs, and operators facing a real decision who want the strongest version of each side argued out loud before they commit — not a generic checklist.

📦 What you get

All three lenses plus the synthesis in one message. Give it new information (an answer to the crux question) and it re-runs the synthesis, not the same debate again.