Paste each new Reel's topic and get cover-frame text, a 3-second spoken hook, and the opening shot direction, built fresh for that clip. It never claims trending-audio or analytics data it cannot access.
Other hook tools give you a score. This one refuses to. It measures which axis your own numbers support, and throws out the ones they do not. Paste your hooks with their real numbers. It builds candidate axes from your own copy, tests within-group homogeneity first, and only then compares groups. An axis whose groups are not internally consistent is rejected, not crowned. Ships with one measured prior: name the specific thing, not the category. On 14 ad creatives that ran 2.44x on CTR.
Diagnose why the first 6 seconds of your short-form video loses viewers — get a second-by-second evidence timeline, up to 3 named findings, 3 structurally different replacement hooks, and a timecoded edit table you can cut today.
Upload any UI screenshot — landing page, app screen, dashboard, mockup — and get a principal-level critique before you ship. 10-dimension diagnosis (hierarchy, typography, spacing, alignment, color, contrast, consistency, imagery, interaction, accessibility) with Ship / Fix / Broken verdicts; Top 3 fixes with exact values; Refinement, Conviction, Resilience; Principal Craft Score 1–10, justified. Built by a principal-level product designer. For designers, founders, PMs.
Predict second-by-second viewer retention for the first six seconds of a short-form video hook, then provide concrete opening fixes.
Turns foundation elevation readings and field notes into a finished ASCE Level B inspection report PDF - relative elevation survey table, chord-searched deflection ratio with tilt reported separately, plan-view contour map, coded visual observations, sub-slab plumbing slope analysis against code minimums, and a plain-language property owner summary.
You ran a test and one variant looks better. Is that a finding or a coin flip? Paste trials and successes per variant. You get Wilson 95% intervals, a two-proportion test, and the check almost nobody runs: an overdispersion gate asking whether your grouping label explains anything. If the spread inside a group beats the spread between groups, no winner is declared. A p-value near zero has died on this gate before. Post-hoc axes get labelled. Underpowered tests get a sample size.
Three blind reviewers audit a sticker or emoticon pack concept, cross-examine each other, and give one revise-or-proceed verdict.
I've spent years in fitting bays reading Trackman data — this Skill works the way a $200/hour fitting reads: paste your Trackman, GCQuad, Mevo+, R10, or sim numbers and get the one dominant diagnosis, an honest technique-vs-equipment verdict, exact spec directions when equipment is truly the problem, and a practice prescription with a measurable checkpoint. It will tell you NOT to buy a new driver when the data says strike training, which is exactly why you can trust it when it says the opposite