Useful when a topic calls for rigorous research, multi-source analysis, and a deliverable you can confidently share. Provide the research question, and the skill will scope the work, gather relevant evidence, compare sources, synthesize findings, and verify each claim. The result is a structured report with sentence-level citations, a bibliography, stable source IDs, and claims checked against stored source excerpts to reduce unsupported or invented citations.
Opinion research and narrative synthesis: turning cross-platform noise (Reddit / X / YouTube / Hacker News / forums) into a named, source-attributed, period-over-period narrative brief—dominant narratives, per-platform sentiment, emerging concerns, representative quotes (all cited)—not a single sentiment score.
Automatically generate a structured weekly work report from your Claude Code, Cursor activity and git commits — no manual tracking needed. The skill scans your conversation history across multiple AI tools and reconstructs everything you did this week.
Paste one published short's script plus its real analytics and get a retention autopsy of that exact video: a self-contained HTML report with the drop-off mapped second by second, a PASS / REWORK / REBUILD verdict against printed thresholds, a shot-by-shot cut list, and five hook variants.
Want to know what real users actually say about a product? Drop in a name or link — get back a clean report drawn from Reddit, YouTube, Amazon, Kickstarter, and media reviews. You'll see the loudest praise, biggest complaints, features users wish existed, why people buy, why some walk away, and the overall vibe per platform. Every point is graded by how widely it's echoed — real patterns, not one-off noise.
日々の報告業務を効率化するために設計したスキルです。日報・週報で求められる『何を成果として書くか』『課題をどう相談に変えるか』『次に何をやるか』の型を整理し、雑な箇条書き・口語・順不同のメモからでも、上司が30秒で把握できる構造化された報告書を生成します。時系列の作業ログを成果ベースの表現に変換し、サマリー・実績・課題・次アクションへ自動で振り分けることを狙いにしています。
At McKinsey, a recommendation was only as good as the research under it. So I learned to do it right: scope the real question, pull from independent sources, triangulate what's actually true, and ground every claim in evidence. This Skill runs that discipline for you — breaking down a question, comparing sources, verifying claims, and writing a structured report with citations you can check. Decisions on evidence, not vibes.
Paste your rough weekly bullet points and get a polished, submission-ready report in six clear sections. Internal or external tone. Built for weekly reuse.
Writes formal, academic-register reports and articles about MLB (Major League Baseball): game recaps, statistical/scouting analysis, and season previews or feature articles. Pulls real data via the sports tool before writing (never fabricates scores or stats), and enforces a professional tone — no casual sports-blog language, clear structured sections (summary, findings, context), and precise stat citations.