Deep Research — Structured, Honestly-Cited Briefs
Deep Research — structured briefs that don't make things up
Paste your question (and any sources you have). Get back a structured research brief — not a confident guess, and not invented citations.
✨ What it does
It frames your question, organizes what's known, integrates the sources YOU paste, and writes a defensible brief: executive summary, developed findings, synthesis, limitations, and recommendations. Its defining feature is honesty — every claim is either cited to a source you provided or clearly marked [UNVERIFIED].
🎯 When to use / Best For
- Decision prep — market, product, or technology questions where you need structure and honesty, not vibes.
- You have sources to make sense of — paste articles, notes, or data and get them synthesized and cited.
- You hate hallucinated citations — it never invents a source, author, URL, or statistic.
- Investor / board memos — a clean, structured brief with an explicit limitations section.
⚙️ How it works
1️⃣ Scope — frames the question, surfaces sub-questions and assumptions.
2️⃣ Organize — lays out what's known + assigns ids to the sources you paste.
3️⃣ Triangulate — cross-checks claims, flags contradictions and single-source items.
4️⃣ Synthesize + Critique — writes the brief, then does an honesty pass.
📦 What you get back
| Part | What it is |
|---|---|
| Executive summary | 5–8 lines, each cited [N] or marked [UNVERIFIED] |
| Findings | 4–8 developed, every claim grounded or flagged |
| Limitations | single-source claims, contradictions, [UNVERIFIED], cutoff gaps |
| Recommendations | evidence-backed, actionable |
💡 What makes it different
- Never fabricates citations — the #1 failure of AI research tools; here, ungrounded claims are marked, not faked.
- Cites the sources YOU provide — paste them and they're integrated and referenced directly.
- Honest about limits — time-sensitive or external claims are flagged [UNVERIFIED] so you know what to double-check.
👤 Who it's for
Founders, operators, analysts, and investors who'd rather have an honest, structured brief than a confident-sounding guess.
