Code Review Playbook — Culture & Standards
Guides, a 56-item checklist, a ready PR template, and a fill-in team policy for code review culture. Includes 10 good/bad comment pairs and 30 situational review comments, unified by a blocker/suggestion/nit/question/praise severity system.
#엔지니어링#제품#생산성
평점
더 많은 평가가 필요합니다
판매
0
사용 방법
다운로드
Code Review Playbook — Culture & Standards for Teams
A package of guides + checklist + policy template for establishing your team's code review culture and standards. Ready to adopt straight into a real engineering wiki, with a severity-prefix system (blocker / suggestion / nit / question / praise) used consistently across every document.
What's inside
| File | Contents |
|---|---|
| reviewer-guide.md | Review priorities (correctness > design > readability > style), time management, 10 good/bad comment pairs |
| author-guide.md | Making small PRs (vertical/horizontal splits, stacked PRs), self-review, writing descriptions |
| review-checklist.md | Security 12 · performance 11 · error handling 11 · testing 10 · readability 12 = 56 items |
| pr-template.md | Ready-to-use PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md |
| team-review-policy-template.md | Fill-in policy doc: SLA, approval rules, merge conditions, hotfix process |
| review-comment-examples.md | 30 situational review comments (substitution format) |
Who this is for
- Teams whose reviews get stuck on style nits
- Teams that have had review comments turn into friction
- Teams where review SLAs and approval rules only exist implicitly
How to use
- Copy pr-template.md into your repo's
.github/ - Post the reviewer/author guides to your wiki and follow the 2-week rollout plan
- Fill in the policy template blanks to lock down your team's standards
- Reference the checklist and comment library during reviews
What you get
- Fewer review rounds and shorter time-to-merge
- Standardized comment tone that reduces review conflict
- A higher share of bugs caught in review before they hit production
