Get cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity & Google AI Overviews — an evidence-based GEO audit with copy-ready fixes, not folklore.
Tell me what your coding agent keeps getting wrong, and I write the CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md that would have stopped it. Not a template filled in from your README - a file built from the landmines only you know: the command that needs an undocumented env var, the directory nobody should hand-edit, the decision that looks wrong and is deliberate. A complete file in the first reply, gaps marked TODO, three questions at most. Free for three requests.
Find out if ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI recommend your brand — or send buyers to your competitors. From one URL: the questions where you're invisible, competitor Share-of-Voice, a 0–100 GEO score, per-page citation-readiness, and a 30/60/90-day fix plan. A client-ready report for agencies and marketers, built on the TriloAI GEO methodology. (Directional audit via your agent + web search; verified 4-platform tracking at geotriloai.com.)
AI Brainstorm puts Claude, Gemini, and ChatGPT in the same room — each one answering independently, so you actually see where they agree, where they don't, and why. Useful when the stakes are high enough to want more than one opinion: picking a tech stack, stress-testing a strategy, getting honest feedback on your writing, or thinking through a decision you've been sitting on too long. Stop copy-pasting the same prompt across three tabs. One question gets you all three answers, in one place.
Academic sanity-check with interactive HTML dashboard. Detects look-ahead bias, over-parameterization, and benchmarks against 10 canonical blueprints via animated SVG gauges and color-coded KPI cards. Parses natural language, code, or CSV uploads. Output auto-adapts (EN/ZH-TW/ZH-CN). Built on De Prado (2018). For students and strategy developers. Not financial advice.
Paste your CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md and tell it what your agent actually did wrong. It names the rule that failed, quotes the line that should have caught it or says plainly that nothing in your file covers it, and hands you replacement text you can paste back. Built from logged incidents on a production pipeline run with a coding agent, not from general advice. With no incident it still reports what your file itself shows. It makes failures visible; it does not promise they stop.
Review AI agents, automation workflows, and project architectures for design gaps, risks, missing requirements, and improvement opportunities.
Review a diff or pull request for real bugs before merge: four reviewer lenses (one model applying each in turn) check each other and tag findings CONFIRMED, CORROBORATED or DISPUTED.
Chokepoint Intel AI maps the bottlenecks behind AI infrastructure and shows who really controls them. Give it a theme, a company, or a claim you saw online: it scores each bottleneck with a 6-factor rubric, tests claims against primary sources, flags red flags, and tags every fact as Verified, Reported, Claimed, Background, or Unknown. Works in English, Arabic, and French. Research and education only. No buy/sell advice, price targets, or predictions. AI-generated; verify before acting.