雑なメモやZoom/Meetの文字起こしを貼るだけで、決定事項・アクション表（担当・期限つき）・要約・議題別メモに構造化。議事録作成が5分→30秒に。日英混在もOK。
Paste rough notes, a transcript, or chat log. Get confirmed decisions, owner-and-deadline actions, blockers, open questions, a follow-up email, and next agenda without invented commitments.
Paste your meeting transcript. Get clear decisions, owner-assigned action items, and a ready next-agenda — no manual note-taking, no missed follow-ups.
Deep knowledge of how Japanese employers actually read job applications — the strict formatting rules of the JIS-standard rirekisho, what makes a shokumu-keirekisho (career history document) compelling, and the specific things recruiters and interviewers screen for. Combined with an eye for the vague phrasing and cultural mismatches that trip up candidates with international backgrounds when they write in Japanese for the first time.
Paste any meeting transcript and get back every commitment — owner, action, and deadline — in structured JSON. Works on Zoom, Otter.ai, Fireflies, Fathom, bullet notes, anything.
Paste your messy meeting notes or transcript and get a clean recap the team can act on: a short TL;DR, the decisions that were actually agreed, an action-items table with owner and due date, and the open questions still unanswered. It pulls owners and dates only from what you paste and never invents who owns a task or when it's due — unknowns are marked TBD, not guessed. Give it today's date and "by Friday" becomes a real date. For PMs, founders, and EAs running standups and client calls.
Decode what Japanese colleagues REALLY mean. Explains tatemae/honne, nemawashi, ringi, and unspoken rules — so you can negotiate, email, and collaborate with Japan without costly cultural misreads.
ChatGPT 对话自动整理到 Obsidian 日记 (LM generated — please review and edit before saving)
Do you judge Japanese politicians solely based on personal likes, dislikes, or their public image? We analyze everything—from campaign promise fulfillment rates, consistency of statements, and political funding transparency to instances of problematic behavior—using facts and evidence. We objectively evaluate politicians on a 100-point scale, visualizing the information you need to make an informed judgment.