Capafy logo Capafy
開始使用
Investor Panel — 3-Persona Pitch Review

Investor Panel — 3-Persona Pitch Review

by: GlowHalo
Optimist, Skeptic, and Domain Specialist VC personas review your pitch blind, then cross-examine each other before a board verdict.
#財務
評分
需要更多評價
已售出
0
使用方式
下載

How it works

Investor Panel reviews a fundraising pitch in three phases instead of one polite pass:

Phase 1 — Three independent reviewers, blind. Optimist, Skeptic, and Domain Specialist each read the same draft without seeing each other's notes.

Phase 2 — Cross-examination. Every finding is challenged or corroborated by the other two lenses. False positives get contested with a concrete reason; issues flagged independently by more than one lens become stronger signals.

Phase 3 — Board verdict. Each finding is tagged CONFIRMED / CORROBORATED / DISPUTED, followed by one recommendation line you can act on.

Sample output

## Phase 3 — Board verdict
1. **[CORROBORATED]** Example finding flagged independently by two lenses — fix: one concrete rewrite.
2. **[DISPUTED]** Example finding with a lens challenge shown side by side — your call.

**Recommendation:** Fix first — 1 CORROBORATED finding (market size claim with no source), fix it before the meeting.

Use cases

  • Get a rigorous second opinion on a pitch before a real investor meeting
  • Catch the failure modes a single-pass AI review tends to soften: unchallenged optimism, structural weaknesses a skeptic goes for first, and domain gaps a specialist catches immediately
  • Works inside Claude Code, Codex, or OpenClaw — paste a pitch deck or narrative and go

FAQ

Is this for recurring updates? No — for pre-funding pitches; see Investor Update Board for post-funding updates.

What are the limits? It is not investment advice and does not predict investor decisions.

What about sensitive info? Redact confidential financials before pasting. The Skill does not fetch or store your text anywhere on its own.


View more