Investor Update Board — 3-Lens Update Review
How it works
Investor Update Board reviews your recurring investor or board update in three phases instead of one polite pass:
Phase 1 — Three independent reviewers, blind. Vagueness Auditor, Bad-News Radar, and Ask Sharpener each read the same draft without seeing each other's notes.
Phase 2 — Cross-examination. Every finding is challenged or corroborated by the other two lenses. False positives get contested with a concrete reason; issues flagged independently by more than one lens become stronger signals.
Phase 3 — Board verdict. Each finding is tagged CONFIRMED / CORROBORATED / DISPUTED, followed by one send recommendation line you can act on.
Sample output
## Phase 3 — Board verdict
1. **[CORROBORATED]** "Strong growth this month" has no number or baseline — Vagueness Auditor + Bad-News Radar both flagged it. Fix: state the MRR figure and last month's comparison.
2. **[CONFIRMED]** The intro ask ("let us know if you can help") names no target — fix: name the company and the role you want an intro to.
**Send recommendation:** Fix first — 1 CORROBORATED finding, rewrite that section before sending.
Use cases
- Sanity-check a monthly or quarterly investor update before it goes to your cap table
- Catch buried bad news (churn, burn, runway) and vague claims before investors do
- Turn a fuzzy "let us know if you can help" into an ask an investor can act on in under a minute
- Works inside Claude Code, Codex, or OpenClaw — paste the draft and go
FAQ
Is this for pitch decks? No — it reviews recurring updates to existing investors after funding, not pre-funding pitch narratives.
Does it replace legal or financial advice? No. It reviews clarity and candor of the writing only; it does not verify your numbers or give investment or legal advice.
What if my update contains sensitive financials? Redact anything you'd rather not share before pasting. The Skill does not fetch or store your text anywhere on its own.
