Capafy logo Capafy
開始使用
Sticker Concept Board — 3-Lens Concept Review

Sticker Concept Board — 3-Lens Concept Review

by: GlowHalo
Three blind reviewers audit a sticker or emoticon pack concept, cross-examine each other, and give one revise-or-proceed verdict.
#圖像
評分
需要更多評價
已售出
0
使用方式
下載

How it works

Sticker Concept Board reviews a sticker or emoticon pack concept (character, expression list, theme) in three phases instead of one polite pass:

Phase 1 — Three independent reviewers, blind. Copy & Concept Editor, Resemblance & Brand Risk Scout, and Market Skeptic each read the same material without seeing each other's notes.

Phase 2 — Cross-examination. Every finding is challenged or corroborated by the other two lenses. False positives get contested with a concrete reason; issues flagged independently by more than one lens become stronger signals.

Phase 3 — Board verdict. Each finding is tagged CONFIRMED / CORROBORATED / DISPUTED, followed by one recommendation line you can act on.

Sample output

Real, unedited output from running this Skill on a sample concept ("Mochi Cat Office Life", a 24-sticker KakaoTalk pack whose creator admits it resembles a famous white cartoon cat). Phase 3 verdict only:

## Phase 3 — Board verdict
1. **[CORROBORATED]** Resemblance to a famous white cartoon cat: the creator's own note admits it, and removing the bow leaves species, color, and round shape intact. Flagged by the Resemblance Scout and supported by the Market Skeptic. — fix: change silhouette, proportions, face layout, and color accents so it is clearly a different character, and get a real legal opinion before commissioning final art.
2. **[CORROBORATED]** The character has no distinctive personality hook or differentiator, and the concept gives no reason to pick this pack over many similar white-cat or office packs. Flagged by the Concept Editor, the Resemblance Scout (no distinguishing feature), and the Market Skeptic. — fix: define one signature trait or prop and a single sentence on why this pack differs.
3. **[CORROBORATED]** About half of the 24 expressions are generic (happy wave, sleepy, thumbs up, thinking, high five, love heart, shocked, sad, laughing, angry, good night) and not tied to the office theme. Flagged by the Concept Editor and the Market Skeptic. — fix: restage them in office situations with the cat's personality.
4. **[CONFIRMED]** The theme names "Monday morning" and "lunch menu debate," but no sticker in the list covers a Monday morning or a menu debate. — fix: add them.
5. **[CONFIRMED]** Missing high-frequency office replies such as "understood / on it," "on my way / leaving work," "please check," and a dining-together reply. — fix: swap redundant emotion slots (sad, shocked, love heart) for these.
6. **[DISPUTED]** Daily-use stickers (good morning, thank you bow, sorry bow, thumbs up) are the least differentiated. — challenge: "A generic thank-you bow is fine if the cat draws it with personality, so the issue is execution rather than the list." (your call)
7. **[DISPUTED]** Standard price and unknown market data. — challenge: informational only; no pricing or competitor facts were provided, so nothing can be concluded. (your call)
8. **[CONFIRMED]** Pack name and expression labels are flat, and no caption voice is defined. — fix: define the Korean office-slang caption voice and a more distinctive pack name.

**Submission recommendation:** Revise first — 3 CORROBORATED findings (resemblance to a famous white cat, no distinctive character hook, generic expressions). Do not proceed to final art yet: make the character clearly original, sharpen its hook, and replace the generic slots with office-specific and high-frequency replies. Not legal advice; get a real legal opinion on the resemblance before commissioning.

Use cases

  • Get a rigorous second opinion on a sticker pack concept before you draw it
  • Catch the failure modes a single-pass AI review tends to soften: generic concepts, resemblance to licensed characters or competitor packs, and packs that will not stand out in a crowded store
  • Works inside Claude Code, Codex, or OpenClaw — paste the concept description and expression list and go

FAQ

Does it guarantee approval? No — it flags concept and resemblance risks only.

What are the limits? It reviews the concept text only and cannot guarantee store approval or trademark clearance.

What about sensitive info? Run a trademark search yourself before submitting. The Skill does not fetch or store your text anywhere on its own.


View more