Serenity（@aleabitoreddit）是 X 平台上知名的 AI／半導體供應鏈分析師（粉絲逾 90 萬），以早期挖掘隱藏標的聞名。我是她的粉絲，但我本人不是 Serenity：這個 AI 技能會將 Serenity 的公開貼文整理成每日報告——每一支被提及的股票都會標註多頭、空頭或中立，並附上觀點歷史紀錄與原文連結。可依日、週、月、季切換檢視，輕鬆掌握她的關注脈絡與變化趨勢。本服務與 Serenity 無任何關聯，亦不構成投資建議——僅為方便研究其公開貼文所設計的資訊介面。
Expert AI lawyer that scans any contract for hidden risks before you sign. Detects risky clauses, unfair terms, one-sided conditions and missing protections — in seconds. Works for: Employment, Rental, Vendor, NDA, Service, Partnership & Freelance contracts. You get: ⚖️ Risk score (0-100) 🚨 Critical & high risk clause detection 📋 Key terms extraction 💬 Negotiation points ⚠️ Missing clause alerts 📝 Expert legal summary Upload PDF or paste contract text to start.
Built by a team that has reviewed thousands of contracts across SaaS, employment, vendor, and agency agreements. This skill flags the clauses that actually bite you — hidden auto-renewals, one-sided indemnification, IP assignment traps, and liability caps buried in legalese. Think of it as a trained legal eye that never misses the fine print.
I build and run the web-scraping engine behind a production AI assistant. The hardest sites on the web — JavaScript-heavy apps, empty sitemaps, and content behind search forms — hand a normal crawler nothing but cookie banners. Over months I learned to make them give up clean data: render fully, find the hidden pages by search, dedup by stable IDs, and quality-gate every page so junk never reaches your dataset. I've distilled that pipeline into this Skill — self-healing and cost-capped.
Paste a contract, lease, ToS, or vendor clause and get a plain-English red-flag review: which clauses are risky, what they mean in practice, and what to ask before you sign. Flags sneaky auto-renewals, one-sided termination, broad non-competes, and vague liability terms. Reasons from your pasted text plus general contract-pattern knowledge only — never fetches the real document or your jurisdiction's law. Not legal advice; for awareness, not a replacement for a real lawyer.
Jurisdiction-aware contract risk review (US + Taiwan): clause-by-clause red flags, a 0–100 risk score, paste-ready redlines and negotiation tactics for freelancers and SMBs.
Defensive application-security auditing: turns a repo, manifest, or code snippet into an actionable report—dependency vulnerabilities, leaked secrets, insecure code patterns, and config hardening—mapped to OWASP Top 10 and ranked by severity. Finds risk and the fix only, never attack content.
Worried your email sounds too harsh? Paste your draft and the recipient context, and SendGuard reviews it from the reader's side. It highlights the riskiest sentence, flags tone issues — cold, pushy, or hard to walk back — and returns a clear verdict: Send, Revise, or Hold. Great for client emails, escalations, or any sensitive message. Structured Markdown output. Runs locally, no data sent. Want a deeper analysis? Try ExpertPanel — an AI advisory board reviews your work and scores it.
Drafts evidence-backed answers for vendor security questionnaires, customer security reviews, RFP security sections, privacy reviews, and AI trust questions. It preserves portal formats, cites sources, flags missing proof, and creates follow-up checklists without inventing compliance claims.