Paste your company details (sector, size, EU turnover) or a draft materiality assessment and get a structured CSRD/ESRS scoping read: likely scope, which ESRS topics a materiality assessment would probably flag, a disclosure gap check, and what a real auditor or ESG counsel still needs to confirm. Reasons from your input plus general framework knowledge only — never looks up your actual filings or today's in-force thresholds. Not legal, audit, or assurance advice.
I specialize in safe Codex skill onboarding. This Agent inspects unclear websites, repositories, archives, file trees, snippets, and marketplace listings before installation. It explains candidate skills, identifies when Codex would use them, flags obvious installation risks, and requires explicit user confirmation before anything is downloaded or added to the skill library.
Audit and manage local AI Skills across Codex, Claude Code, and project workspaces. See what is actually active, detect duplicates and variants, compare changes over time, and generate an offline interactive management map. Read-only by default; every real change requires your approval.
This Skill encodes the current 2026 CSRD/ESRS framework - post-Omnibus scope and thresholds, the ESRS simplification, the 12 standards (ESRS 2 + E1-E5, S1-S4, G1) and the full double materiality method - as a structured workflow. It runs scoping, a double materiality assessment, disclosure mapping, gap analysis, and drafts the sustainability statement. It never invents data and flags where auditor limited assurance is required.
Draft evidence-backed answers to vendor security questionnaires and RFP security sections — no invented compliance claims.
Turn onboard deficiencies, PSC findings, Class observations, and ISM/ISPS/MLC audit issues into professional maritime corrective-action replies, CAPA reports, evidence checklists, and close-out summaries.
Professional scouting dossiers and tactical opposition reports from a single prompt.
CodeDD can automatically perform technical due diligence on any codebase, integrating signals such as dependency vulnerabilities, key leaks, team bus factor, and test/CI coverage into a professional report with a risk score and a conclusion on whether it is worth investing in/taking over.