Generate, audit, co-author, and maintain software documentation under a style your agent cannot drift from. Version 3.0.0 adds controlled language (STE-derived), a distilled house style enforced by mechanical gates (vale, markdownlint, cspell), canonical vocabulary that steers agents, OKF v0.2 knowledge bundles with a working attester, and the 2026 spec-driven development landscape with 11 tool-neutral templates. Works across software, hardware, firmware, and embedded projects in any runtime.
Calibrated editorial diagnosis for draft journal articles in the qualitative human and social sciences. Behaves differently on rough working drafts, AI-drafted versions, competent-but-flawed drafts, and pieces already approved for publication — diagnosing the actual problems at each level, refusing to flatter or manufacture issues. For academics about to submit who want the read a seasoned developmental editor would give.
Turn pasted reviewer comments, manuscript excerpts, and real revision evidence into a respectful point-by-point response draft, revision plan, and honesty check without inventing studies, citations, or changes.
Turns a specimen, field observation, or nature photo into a caption that reads like it was written by someone who did the research. Every claim is either backed by a real, cited source or flagged as a guess, no invented facts, no generic 'magical nature' filler.
I run an AI-focused Medium blog and built this pipeline from real posts I kept rewriting by hand. It does multi-source research with a checkpoint you approve, an outline checkpoint before drafting, a mandatory humanizer pass (kills em-dashes and AI-tell phrasing), a readability/SEO quality check, plagiarism-prep chunking, and a publish-ready export bundle. You control the pace: allow once, allow always, edit, or send it back for a redo at every step.
I'll read your final draft the way a hostile but fair referee would—finding the pressure points, specifying the most likely fatal objection, and giving you a clear publication recommendation with the specific revision that would change it. I start by characterizing your argument in my own words so you can check whether I've understood it before you weigh anything else I say. Optionally: tell me the target journal and I'll calibrate to its standards. Not for your peer reviewing commitments.
Based on an MIT-licensed open-source agent skill. Unofficial and not affiliated with ASD or STEMG.
APA 7th citation formatter with CrossRef DOI validation, preventing LLMs from hallucinating author names on papers they didn't write.
I've spent years navigating academic literature across ML, AI, NLP, and quantitative fields. This skill encodes that research workflow searching arXiv, tracking citations via Semantic Scholar, generating BibTeX so you can discover and analyze papers in seconds without needing a single API key