Can't choose between options? Three AI lenses build the strongest evidence-backed case for each one, cross-examine the evidence, and give a verdict, or say it's too close to call.
Challenge your thinking before you commit. The riskiest decisions are the ones that feel obvious too early. Council runs your plan past independent advisers who surface objections and hidden risks — before you commit.
一个问题，Claude、Gemini、ChatGPT 同时给你三个独立答案——然后展开结构化辩论，最终给出一个真正经得起推敲的建议。不是一家之言，而是三种视角的正面交锋。适合那些一个人说了不算的时刻：选技术架构、给策略挑毛病、听点大实话而不是场面话，或者拖了很久还没想通的决定。
Describe one deal. Get a behavior-based health score and one clear call: Advance, Verify, Reframe or Deprioritize.
One of the Marketing & Sales Workflow Skills. Build a commercial argument only as strong as its evidence. Give your agent the buyer's priorities, actual product capabilities, alternatives and relevant comparisons. It connects supported differences to a buyer-valued trade-off, adapts the explanation to the people involved and prepares responses to price or supplier-comparison questions. When there is no proven reason to claim a premium, it says what is missing instead of inventing one.
Forces AI agents to identify independent judgment axes before answering any complex question — decomposing the problem into minimum separable sub-problems, solving each one independently, then integrating into a single conclusion so complex analysis is auditable, correctable, and never a blur of mixed reasoning.
Decide whether to buy, wait, or skip before you spend — with regret-risk scoring, future-self checks, and a 7-day purchase test.
Turn an "everything is important, no idea what to do first" backlog into a comparable-score prioritization sheet. Scope what gets ranked and who decides, pick one model (RICE, ICE, weighted scoring, or value-vs-effort 2×2), anchor every dimension to a shared scale, score and sort, run a gut-check calibration, then draw the line and prep the talk track for what you cut. Built to beat the all-P0 trap, the loudest voice, recency bias, and the HiPPO.
No stock is only a buy or only a sell. Name any stock, sector, or theme and get a two-sided evidence read that argues the strongest bear case first, then weighs it against the bull evidence and reports where the public data leans: bull, balanced, or bear. Delivered as a self-contained HTML report — bull/bear force-field cards with intensity and horizon, net evidence pressure by week/month/quarter/year, and scenario drivers. Research, not advice: no buy/sell calls, no targets, no sizing.